|
NOTE:
THIS PAPER WAS PUBLISHED IN 2005 WHEN THE AUTHOR WAS STILL
ADMINISTRATOR OF LWUA
Credit
Rating System to Enhance Credit Flow
for Water Supply Projects in the Philippines
by
Administrator Lorenzo H. Jamora
Local Water Utilities Administration
Quezon City, Philippines
ABSTRACT. Traditionally, Water Districts in the
Philippines have acquired concession loans from the Local
Water Utilities Administration for their development. However,
with the tight capital expenditure of the National Government,
there is a need to rationalize the allocation of scarce
and concessional funds in the water supply sector and a
need to enhance the flow of credit into the sector from
nontraditional fund sources.
Executive Order 279, "Instituting Reforms In The Financing
Policies For The Water Supply and Sewerage Sector And Water
Service Providers And Providing For The Rationalization
Of LWUA's Organizational Structure And Operations In Support
Thereof' which among other things, seeks to enhance credit
to WDs by improving investor confidence in the water supply
sector and seeks to rationalize the allocation of scarce
financial resources in the sector. One of the instruments
of LWUA in realizing these objectives is the establishment
of a classification system where WDs are classified either
as Creditworthy or Semicreditworty or Precreditworthy or
Noncreditworthy. The Classification System together with
Project Evaluation and Business Profile sum up to become
a WD Credit Rating System to provide investors with critical
information to make an informed investment decision based
on the investor's risk-return preferences.
Sector Background
In the year 2003, the population of the Philippines was
almost 80 million with. 16 percent residing in Metro Manila
and the rest (84%) are in the provinces. Thirty-four percent
(34%) of this provincial population is classified as urban
which is served by house connections and sixty-six percent
(66%) are considered as rural which is served by water systems
ranging from Level I to Level III type of service 1. Though
87 percent of the urban population is served by a water
system, many of them require improvement in water quality,
reduction of unaccounted water and maintaining continuous
supply. In terms of Water District (WD) coverage, 47% of
the 1,500 cities and municipalities are served by WDs. However,
86% of those covered by WDs have population coverage below
50% of their populace.
The Water Crisis Act of 1994 stimulated private sector interest
in water supply projects, resulting to the forging of the
concession agreements of the private sector with Metropolitan
Water and Sewerage System. It took sometime though, before
its impact reached the cities and municipalities in the
provinces. There is a cynical view of consumers and local
leaders that the participation of the private sector in
water supply projects has always been traditionally perceived
significantly raise water tariff. On the other hand, in
the absence of credit information on potential projects,
the private creditors have to assess the market and the
perceived credit and business risks are usually applied
a higher debt premium.
One of the key objectives in The Medium-Term Philippine
Development Plan (2004-2010) in the water supply sector
is to provide water to 200 waterless municipalities outside
of Metro Manila. Waterless municipalities are those with
less than 50% water service coverage. Of the 444 operational
water districts only 53 have more than 50% service coverage.
The increasing demand for increased quantity and quality
of water placed a heavy financial burden on the national
government. These circumstances led to the Study on Reforms
In Financial Policies In The Water Supply Sector (2003)
that presented reforms to rationalize the application of
development funds and enhance its flow into the water supply
sector of the Philippines.
Availability of Investment Funds
A. Corporate Capital Structure of Local Water Utilities
Administration (LWUA). LWUA capital fund has been considered
concessionary. It is a blend of the NG's equity or subsidy
with local and foreign borrowings from donor countries or
multilateral agencies. LWUA's sources of capital funds for
its loans to WDs are: (1) Foreign and Local borrowings.
The debt cap for LWUA is nearing exhaustion and the balance
is about 200M US dollars in foreign denomination or an equivalent
of about 11B Phil. Peso. Foreign capital comes from bilateral
and multilateral loans and grants. A total of P1B has been
borrowed from local banks. (2) National Government's (NG)
equity investments of P2.5B. This has been fully subscribed
in 1991 but there is a pending congressional bill to increase
LWUA's authorized capitalization to, P10B. After exhaustion
of the P2.5B, releases to LWUA from the NG were in the form
of subsidies totaling to about P2.0B. The General Appropriations
Act provides that these subsidies are advances to LWUA's
future capitalization. As one of the NG's efforts to cut
its deficit spending, LWUA does not expect further subsidy
releases unless its capitalization is increased by legislation.
(3) Internally Generated Cash (ICG). LWUA generates cash
from its earnings in its operation and invests it back to
its water supply projects. Its ability to internally generate
cash has been impaired through the years mainly by the unprecedented
increase in its foreign debt servicing owing to the doubling
of exchange rate of the Philippine Peso to the Dollar US.
B. Present Private and Government Financing Institutions.
Traditionally, LWUA is the main source of long-term credit
for WDs using foreign sources (bilateral and multilateral
loans or grants) blended with equity contributions. Multilateral
agencies are the JBIC, ADB, IBRD, USAID, AusAid/EFIC, KfW,
French Protocol and DANIDA. Donors like the JICA has extended
grants to a number of WD projects requiring water quality
improvement. In the absence of peso counterpart (from equity
or subsidy releases from the NG) for these foreign loans/grants,
securing foreign longterm credit is no longer feasible.
Further, the doubling of the foreign exchange rate relative
to the Philippine Peso has hurt the financial position of
LWUA.
The Land Bank of the Philippines has been the source of
the Peso counterpart of LWUA's foreign loan when no subsidy
was released from the NG. Since the year 2003, a Memorandum
of Agreement was signed with the Development Bank of the
Philippines where a P2B credit facility was established
for direct lending to WDs. (cf IV.A. 5.)
Attempts were made to bring in private investments in the
form of debt capital for BOT/BOO investors. But delay in
satisfying conditions precedent, e.g., buy-out guaranty,
eroded the viability of the project. Another hindrance was
the absence of an Agency to regulate the water tariff and
its increases.
Hindrances of Capital Flow Into WD Projects
A. Credit Rating System/Agency. Due to the lack of
critical information provided to private capital market
and due to their lack of experience in water projects, many
are reluctant to invest in long-term lending programs for
water supply projects. The lack of a standard rating information
and the absence of a rating agency oblige the investors
to do their own and very often the risk is passed on to
the borrower.
B. Concession Loans. Presently, there are institutional
and policy issues that are constraining capital flow into
the water supply sector. Using equity investments from the
national government, LWUA provided concession loans to water
districts. Due to NEDA Resolution No.4, LWUA's financial
assistance to financially viable projects that can afford
to borrow at commercial terms. LWUA confined its financial
assistance to mostly the larger and more viable WDs. Under
this condition, private or commercial Credit cannot compete
with LWUA's concession loans. LWUA interest rate is tiered
according to this table (GO
TO TABLE 1).
C. Maturity Mismatch. There is a maturity mismatch
of the short term lending of some GFls and PFls compared
to the WDs' need for long term debt. This is happening with
the counterpart peso funded portion of the recent water
supply projects funded by LWUA under the ADS Small Towns,
KfW and AUSaid funding. The peso borrowed to fund the peso
portion of these projects is 7 years that is short of the
useful life of the water supply facilities. Though borrowed
at 7-year maturity, LWUA tried to cushion the impact of
the short-term loan by relending it at 7-10 years depending
on the capability of the WD to service its debt. Front-end
loading unnecessarily raised the water rates during the
first 7 years of the project making it more difficult to
secure advocacy on the part of the consumers and local leaders.
This is so because LWUA has required that projects funded
shall have their water rates fully recover all costs.
D. Issue on Collateral. Banks require collateral pledges
for the loans directly extended to WDs. Due to the heavy
infrastructures required of water supply projects, it is
very likely that the available collateral from' most of
these WDs cannot match the Bank's requirement. Furthermore,
a substantial portion of the total assets of most of the
WDs is still being amortized as a long-term loan with LWUA.
Table 2 (GO TO TABLE
2) is indicative of the level of collateral some WDs
can raise.
Reforms In Financing Water Supply Projects
A. Establishment Of WDs' Creditworthiness
1. Rating System. The Study on Reforms In
Financial Policies The Water Supply sector (2003) presented
several reforms to rationalize and enhance the flow of development
funds in the water supply sector of the Philippines. One
of the recommendations being implemented is the establishment
of a Credit Rating System for water districts and the Local
Water Utilities Administration as the Rating Agency. Private
capital investors considered the lack of suitable credit
rating or other creditworthiness information as one of the
obstacles in the willingness of the sector to participate
in water financing.
The rating system assesses the WD's overall financial and
operational health, ability to take on more long-term debt.
The rating system or WD classification determines which
financing market a WD can obtain loans for its system development
and improvement. A WD can be reclassified by LWUA once every
three years.
2. Criteria. Part of the provisions enunciated
in EO 279 is for LWUA to prepare the criteria for classification
in coordination with GFls. It is submitted to the Oversight
Committee for approval. The classification criteria cover
two major areas, namely, financial and operational each
with a weight of 50 percent. Table 5
(GO TO TABLE 5) shows how WDs are classified as Creditworthy,
Semi-creditworthy, Pre-Creditworthy and Non-Creditworthy
based on the total points earned using the rating system.
The parameters and their corresponding weights are shown
in Table 3 (GO TO TABLE
3) together with the points to be garnered for each
class.
3.
Financial and Operating Parameters (GO
TO TABLE 4)
4. Rationalization of Financing Policies for Water
Districts. With the policy reforms in financing
of water supply projects being installed, LWUA concession
funds will now be confined to develop SCW and PCW WDs and
eventually graduate them into CW WDs. Concession funds will
be given to those that need them most. On the other hand,
the CW water districts will now source their development
funds from the capital market and private/government financing
institutions (PFls and GFls). These sampled water districts
are anecdotally more financially capable water districts
and are more capable of absorbing additional investment
to undertake large capital projects. In the case of Tagum
and Nasugbu WDs, they went directly to the Development Bank
of the Philippines (DBP) to secure a project loan.
5. LWUA-DBP Experience. In a MOA between LWUA
and DBP, the latter provides a credit facility (initially
P2B) directly extended to WDs that are CW with a category
of at least Big WD. LWUA, on the other hand, shall review
the projects to be funded under this facility. This working
agreement forged between LWUA and DBP is an example of building
confidence of water project financiers to invest in water
projects. This arrangement couples LWUA's WD credit rating
system with its expertise in evaluating water supply projects
proposed for funding. LWUA charges a review fee that may
be taken up in the loan of the WD. If there is a need to
increase the water tariff: LWUA (as temporarily deputized
by the NWRB) conducts public hearing for the proposed increase
in tariff and those found to be viable are officially endorsed
to DBP for funding. If the applicant WD has an existing
loan with LWUA, the endorsement takes also the form of a
waiver for that WD to borrow additional loan from DBP. One
of the salient provisions of the MOA is for L WUA to takeover
WDs in default and together with DBP may sit in the Board
of the taken over WD.
WDs being considered by DBP are: (a) Nasugbu - endorsed
to DBP for P65M (b) Tagum - endorsed to DBP for P382M (c)
Valencia - project proposal under review (P65M) (d) Zamboanga
- project proposal preparation (P150M) (e) Pagadian - project
proposal preparation
B. Tapping the PFls and GFls.
6. Issues To Address. There are still some
policies and institutional reforms that need to be in place
to further stimulate financing of water supply projects
by the private and government financing institutions and
from the capital market. Some issues to be tackled are:
a. Maturity Mismatch. Presently, the PFls and some
GFls are not prepared to mobilize funds for WD projects
because of the severe mismatch of the short-term credit
(7 years maximum) against the useful life (25-50 years)
of the physical assets of the WD.
Possible capital markets to tap for investment in water
supply projects are the pension funds like those of the
GSIS and S.S.S. Public pension funds can extend credit beyond
ten years without introducing a mismatch of the term of
the credit they extended with their assets and liabilities.
Pension funds are actively planning to shift their portfolio
to long-term infrastructure investments. Private pension
funds, on the other hand, are not restricted in their investment
and there is encouragement from the" Insurance Commissioner
to be involved in long-term investments.
b. Need for Government Guarantees. The hard reality
is that it is very difficult to encourage the private sector
to invest in the infrastructure sector when there is uncertainty
in the market due to regulation, subsidies and political
interference which could present real constraints to efficient
operation and improved profitability. In such situations,
the private sector sought government guarantees to cover
a wide variety of perceived risks. However, the National
Government has been growingly concerned with its increasing
contingent liabilities associated with the guarantees and
performance undertakings it issued. Some of them have become
real and are now taking a painful hit on the resources of
the National Government.
7. Non-traditional Financing. The following
directions need to be explored and pursued by LWUA to further
enhance the flow of funds into the water sector:
a. Bond issue by LWUA/GFI. LWUA can operate as intermediary
between WD projects and the capital market. LWUA can issue
bonds for a pool of projects of which the bonds shall be
backed by government guarantee. LWUA's authority to take
over a WD in case of default serves also as an indirect
guaranty for such bonds. In addition, securitization of
repayment stream of the pool of WDs can be explored to further
lower the investment risk. When LWUA's request for increase
in capitalization is approved, issuance of bond is made
more attractive by using the future equity releases to LWUA
from the national government as reserves for bond cover.
Bond issue avoids the need for NG to release equity or subsidy
for WD projects. Long-term bonds are usually less expensive
than private participation contracts. Possible capital market
to tap for this undertaking will be the pension funds like
those of the GSIS and SSS 12. Private pension funds are
not restricted in their investment and there is encouragement
from the Insurance Commissioner to be involved in long-term
investments.
Aside from LWUA, government financial institutions can also
venture into the selling of bonds for a pool of WD projects.
The balance sheet of these or the guarantee programs of
these agencies can be used as cover for the bonds issued.
b. Another option is to further strengthen the mobilization
of donor and ILA long-term financing through GFls. The
risk due to foreign exchange fluctuations can be easier
absorbed by GFls having a larger portfolio of diversified
investments where the risk is very much spread compared
to a single or limited number of projects. These investments
can then take the form of long-term peso loans to WDs or
purchase WD long-term bonds issued by LWUA for a pool of
projects or for debt capital for BOT/BOO projects. Thus,
fluctuation in currency exchange does not have to be passed
on to the WDs and eventually to the consumers. Cost of technical
services rendered by LWUA during the takeover shall be charged
to the WD and it becomes part of the income of LWUA as envisioned
in EO 279.
The Future of the Water Districts
Although the MTPDP outlines an ambitious goal, it is not
unattainable. The demand for capital in the water supply
sector is large and critical. The traditional source of
equity and subsidies from the national and local government
continues to diminish and cannot meet the demand for capital.
Non-traditional sources and even the more expensive capital
markets will have to be tapped. The question to ask is,
"will the investors develop increasing confidence to
come up with publicprivate partnership in water supply projects?."
There is a huge challenge ahead and the National Government,
LWUA and the financial institutions and the private sector
need to come up with innovative ways of stimulating additional
financing for the country's water supply program. LWUA's
credit rating system, rationalization of lending policies
and LWUA's technical expertise in project studies/review
may be just an infant's small steps but they will start
the greater strides towards fully developing the water supply
sector in these years to come.
| Table
1. LWUAs Interest Rates |
| |
|
|
Interest
rate, %
|
Million
Peso
|
|
8.5
|
First
P2M
|
|
10.5
|
Next
P5M
|
|
12.5
|
Next
P13M
|
|
14.0
|
Next
P30M
|
|
15.0
|
Over
P50M
|
| Also,
water districts with existing loans with LWUA cannot
acquire additional loan obligation without a waiver
from LWUA. |
| Table
2. Total Assets and Long Term Debt of WDs |
| |
|
|
|
WD
|
Total
Assets, Pm
|
Long-term
Debt, Pm
|
| Davao
(Dec. 2003) |
937
|
139
|
| Tagum
(July 2004) |
92
|
32
|
| Cagayan
de Oro (Dec. 2003) |
1,001
|
510
|
| Butuan
City (Dec. 2003) |
608
|
508
|
| Zamboanga
(Aug. 2004) |
419
|
172
|
| Metro
Cebu (Dec. 2003) |
2,011
|
1,288
|
| Metro
Iloilo (July 2004) |
841
|
672
|
| Bacolod
(April 2004) |
248
|
190
|
| Leyte
Metro (Dec. 2002) |
775
|
23
|
| Baguio
(Jun 2004) |
732
|
563
|
| Nasugbu
(Dec. 2003) |
35
|
14
|
| Batangas
(Mar. 2004) |
176
|
75
|
| San
Jose City (Jun 2004) |
32
|
10
|
| Though
these assets are not mortgaged with LWUA, the loan
covenant provides that LWUA retains first lien. Furthermore,
the loan covenant restricts the borrowing WD from
incurring additional obligations from other lenders
without prior written consent of the LWUA. Although
waiver requirement will eventually be done away with
Creditworthy WDs by EO 279, many of these WDs are
highly leveraged that it may hinder them to get credit. |
| Table
3. Credit Rating Criteria |
|
Parameter
|
Creditworthy
8.5-10
|
Semi
CW
5.5-8.4
|
Pre
CW
3.0-5.4
|
Non
CW
0.0-2.9
|
Weight
|
|
|
Points
Credited |
10
|
6
|
3
|
0
|
| Financial
(50%) |
| Current
Ratio |
CW>2.0
|
1.2<SCW<2.0
|
0.9<PCW<1.2
|
NCW<0.9
|
15%
|
| Debt
Service Ratio |
CW>2.3
|
1.2<SCW<2.3
|
0.9<PCW<1.2
|
NCW<0.9
|
10%
|
| Debt
Equity Ratio |
CW<0.5
|
0.5<SCW<0.7
|
0.7<PCW<1.0
|
NCW>1.0
|
15%
|
| Profit
Margin Ratio |
CW>25%
|
15%<SCW<25%
|
10%<PCW<15%
|
NCW<10%
|
10%
|
| Operation
(50%) |
| |
Collection
Efficiency 15%
|
CW>92%
|
85%<SCW<92%
|
75%<PCW<85%
|
|
| NCW<75%
|
Non Revenue Water 15%
|
CW<25%
|
25%<SCW<45%
|
45%PCW<55%
|
|
|
NCW>55%
5%
|
SC
to Staff Ratio
|
CW>120
|
100<SCW<120
|
80<PCW<100 NCW80
|
|
| Table
4.Financial and Operating Parameters |
|
Parameter
|
Formula
|
Definition
|
| Financial |
| Current
Ratio |
Current
Assets/Current Liabilities |
Measures
liquidity or ability to meet current obligations |
| Debt
Service Ratio |
Net
Opt Income/Annual Debt Service (Principal+Interest)
|
Measures
solvency or ability of utility to meet its debt service
for a time period. |
| Debt/Equity
Ratio |
Long
Term Debt/Total
Capitalization (Debt+Capital)
|
Assesses
ability of utility to take on new long-term financing |
Net
Profit Margin Ratio
|
Net
Income/Operating Revenue |
Measures
profitability or size of operating margin |
| Operational |
| Collection
Efficiency |
Collection
of Current Year Water Sales/Total Water Sales (inclusive
of penalty billing) |
Measures
efficiency of collecting receivable and application
of utilitys credit policy |
| Non
Revenue Water |
1
- (Volume sold divide by Volume produced) |
Indicates portion of water not converted to revenues
due to meter errors, leaks, pilfereage |
| Service
Connection/ |
Active
Connections/Total
Employees |
Indicates
labor productivity and quality of staff management |
| Number
of Service Connections |
Number
of Connections |
Indicates volume of water sales |
| Hours
Service @ 10 psi |
Number
of Hours |
Measures
continuous supply |
Table
5. CY 2003 LWUAs Top Borrowers
|
| Category
|
| Classsification
|
Very
Large
|
Large
|
Big
|
Medium
|
Average
|
Total
|
| Creditworthy
|
Davao
(1)
|
Angeles City, Metro Kalibo, Cagayan de Oro City,
Digos (4)
|
Tarlac
City, Nasugbu, Tabaco,
Camarines Norte, Metro Roxas,
Surigao Metro,
Cotabato City,
Tagum (8)
|
Daraga
(1)
|
|
14
|
| Semi
Creditworthy |
Quezon
Metro, Metro Iloilo, Metro Cebu (3)
|
Baguio
City, San Jose del Monte, Bacolod City, Zamboanga
City (4)
|
Dagupan
City,
Metro Tuguegarao,
Concepcion,
Laguna,
Calamba,
Morong,
San Pablo,
Butuan City,
Misamis Occ. (9)
|
Ilocos Norte, Santiago, GMA, Dumaguete City, Gen.
Santos City, Polomolok (6)
|
Marilao,
Guimba, Obando, Tandag (4)
|
26
|
| Precreditworthy
|
|
|
|
Calbayog
City (1)
|
|
1
|
| Noncreditworthy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| TOTAL
|
4
|
8
|
17
|
8
|
4
|
41
|
| A
number of these WDs are classified as Creditworthy.
They are potential investment opportunities for possible
viable commercial investment. In the forefront would
be Districts like Davao City, Cagayan de Oro City,
Valencia, Tagum, Valencia, and Nasugbu. Other water
districts, which are Semicreditworthy, show good opportunity
of improving themselves operationally and financially
to be considered as candidates for possible commercial
investment. These are Cagayan de Oro, Metro Cebu,
Metro Iloilo, Zamboanga City, Baguio City. The tabulation
validates the opinion that Creditworthy WDs would
lie in the range of WD sizes between Very Large and
Big. |
|
|